Feature comparison
| Eptura Visitor (Proxyclick) | Visitor.Place | |
|---|---|---|
| Target buyer | Enterprise facilities & security | Solo practitioner |
| Pricing | Contract sales, typically $5k–$50k+/yr | Free |
| Deployment | iPad kiosks, enterprise rollout | Web, zero hardware |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, ITAR modules | GDPR-aware, no formal certs yet |
| Watchlist screening | Yes (denied-party, sanctions) | No |
| Digital guest pass | Yes | Yes (3-stage evolving) |
| Apple / Google Wallet | Limited | Native |
| Setup time | Weeks (procurement + IT) | Minutes |
| Best for | Offices with 500+ staff | 1–5 staff, home studio, coworking |
When Eptura Visitor / Proxyclick is the right choice
- You’re a multi-site enterprise with a facilities team.
- You need government-grade compliance (ITAR, CMMC, C-TPAT).
- Your legal team requires watchlist and sanctions screening.
- You have procurement cycles that make a free tool impossible to adopt.
When Visitor.Place is the right choice
- You’re a solo practitioner, consultant, or coach.
- Your compliance requirement is “my guest should find the front door.”
- You want to start today, not in six weeks.
- You don’t have $5,000/year to spend on a lobby product.
What each product is missing for the other’s buyer
Eptura Visitor can do everything Visitor.Place does, plus vastly more — but it’s not priced, packaged, or onboarded for a single user. Visitor.Place is not built for enterprise compliance. Neither is a defect; both are deliberate.
See also: Envoy vs Visitor.Place, SwipedOn vs Visitor.Place.